Studi Komparatif Visualisasi Render Konvensional Mahasiswa Desain Interior Universitas Pradita vs. AI Generatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53008/44db9k86Keywords:
visualisasi desain interior, perangkat lunak 3D, mesin render, studi komparatif, kecerdasan buatanAbstract
This study presents a comparative study on the quality of interior design visualization. It compares student work from Pradita University, which uses conventional software (3ds Max & SketchUp) with V-Ray and Enscape rendering engines, against results from generative artificial intelligence (AI) from various platforms. Using criteria such as efficiency, speed, visual quality, creativity, personalization, accuracy, ease of use, and limitations, this analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.The comparison shows that while AI excels in efficiency, speed, and ease of use for initial idea exploration, conventional software remains irreplaceable for personalization, technical accuracy, and the photorealistic visual quality needed for professional presentations. This study concludes that AI serves as a revolutionary complementary tool in the early stages of design, while conventional software is still the main instrument for precise and accurate final design.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Hak cipta jurnal ini ditugaskan untuk KALBISCIENTIA sebagai penerbit jurnal berdasarkan pengetahuan penulis, sedangkan hak moral publikasi merupakan milik penulis. Setiap publikasi cetak dan elektronik dapat diakses secara terbuka untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Dewan editorial tidak bertanggung jawab atas pelanggaran hak cipta kepada pihak lain selain dari yang telah disebutkan sebelumnya. Reproduksi bagian mana pun dari jurnal ini (dicetak atau online) hanya akan diizinkan dengan izin tertulis dari KALBISCIENTIA: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi.